Editors:
Reports on the results, experiences and lessons learned from various evaluation initiatives for Semantic Web Services (SWS)
Provides an overview of the state of the art with respect to implemented SWS technologies
Details the variety of current Semantic service approaches for users and tool providers
Provides valuable information to enhance future evaluation methodologies and techniques for SWS
Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (22 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Introduction
-
Results from the S3 Contest: OWL-S and SAWSDL Matchmaker Evaluation Tracks
-
Front Matter
-
-
Results from the S3 Contest: Cross Evaluation Track
-
Front Matter
-
-
Results from the Semantic Web Service Challenge
-
Front Matter
-
About this book
Over the last decade, a great amount of effort and resources have been invested in the development of Semantic Web Service (SWS) frameworks. Numerous description languages, frameworks, tools, and matchmaking and composition algorithms have been proposed. Nevertheless, when faced with a real-world problem, it is still very hard to decide which of these different approaches to use.
In this book, the editors present an overall overview and comparison of the main current evaluation initiatives for SWS. The presentation is divided into four parts, each referring to one of the evaluation initiatives. Part I covers the long-established first two tracks of the Semantic Service Selection (S3) Contest – the OWL-S matchmaker evaluation and the SAWSDL matchmaker evaluation. Part II introduces the new S3 Jena Geography Dataset (JGD) cross evaluation contest. Part III presents the Semantic Web Service Challenge. Lastly, Part IV reports on the semantic aspects of the Web Service Challenge. The introduction to each part provides an overview of the evaluation initiative and overall results for its latest evaluation workshops. The following chapters in each part, written by the participants, detail their approaches, solutions and lessons learned.
This book is aimed at two different types of readers. Researchers on SWS technology receive an overview of existing approaches in SWS with a particular focus on evaluation approaches; potential users of SWS technologies receive a comprehensive summary of the respective strengths and weaknesses of current systems and thus guidance on factors that play a role in evaluation.Editors and Affiliations
-
University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA
Brian Blake
-
, Knowledge Media Institute - KMI, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Liliana Cabral
-
Fak. Mathematik und Informatik, Inst. Informatik, Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
Birgitta König-Ries
-
University of Jena, Jena, Germany
Ulrich Küster
-
SRI International, MENLO PARK, USA
David Martin
About the editors
M. Brian Blake is a Professor of Computer Science and Associate Dean for Research in the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame, IL, USA. His research has focused on internet computing, service-oriented computing, and agent-based workflow systems. He was the founder of the WS Challenge, which concentrates on evaluating the software engineering quality of service composition systems.
Liliana Cabral is a Research Fellow at the Open University, UK. She developed technologies and presented a number of tutorials on Semantic Web Services in related conferences, and has also been a member of several projects from the European Commission concerning Semantic Web Services. Liliana is currently the chair of the SWS Challenge initiative and a member of the SEALS (Semantic Evaluation at Large Scale) project (EC FP7).
Birgitta König-Ries holds the Heinz-Nixdorf Endowed Chair for Distributed Information Systems at the University of Jena, Germany. Prior to this she was with the Technical University of Munich, Florida International University, the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, and the University of Karlsruhe. Her group is working on Semantic Web Services and on portal technology, with a special focus on the evaluation of SWS frameworks.
Ulrich Küster has received a PhD on the evaluation of Semantic Web Service technology from Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany. He co-chaired the SWS Challenge initiative for several years, served in the steering committee and as a track chair for the S3 Contest initiative and has held tutorials about the evaluation of semantic technologies.
David Martin is a Software Engineering Manager in the Siri team at Apple (Cupertino, California, USA), and previously was a Senior Computer Scientist in the Artificial Intelligence Center of SRI International. His research areas include agent-based systems, Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services, intelligent assistance, and knowledge-based systems engineering. David was a Principal Investigator for DARPA's DAML program that created the Semantic Web initiative, and had a leading role in the development of OWL for Services (OWL-S) and the Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL). He has served as an organizer of many workshops related to Web Services, including the combined Service Matching and Resource Retrieval and Semantic Service Selection (SMR2 / S3) series of workshops and the first SWS Challenge workshop.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Semantic Web Services
Book Subtitle: Advancement through Evaluation
Editors: Brian Blake, Liliana Cabral, Birgitta König-Ries, Ulrich Küster, David Martin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28735-0
Publisher: Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
eBook Packages: Computer Science, Computer Science (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-642-28734-3Published: 28 June 2012
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-642-42664-3Published: 18 July 2014
eBook ISBN: 978-3-642-28735-0Published: 28 June 2012
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XIV, 362
Topics: Information Systems Applications (incl. Internet), Artificial Intelligence, Software Engineering, System Performance and Evaluation