Skip to main content
Book cover

Advances in Pattern Recognition - ICAPR 2001

Second International Conference Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, March 11-14, 2001 Proceedings

  • Conference proceedings
  • © 2001

Overview

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS, volume 2013)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (46 papers)

  1. NEURAL NETWORKS & COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

  2. CHARACTER RECOGNITION & DOCUMENT ANALYSIS

  3. FEATURE SELECTION & ANALYSIS

Keywords

About this book

The paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we describe the no- orientation-discontinuity interfering model based on a Gaussian stochastic model in analyzing the properties of the interfering strokes. In section 3, we describe the improved canny edge detector with an ed- orientation constraint to detect the edges and recover the weak ones of the foreground words and characters; In section 4, we illustrate, discuss and evaluate the experimental results of the proposed method, demonstrating that our algorithm significantly improves the segmentation quality; Section 5 concludes this paper. 2. The norm-orientation-discontinuity interfering stroke model Figure 2 shows three typical samples of original image segments from the original documents and their magnitude of the detected edges respectively. The magnitude of the gradient is converted into the gray level value. The darker the edge is, the larger is the gradient magnitude. It is obvious that the topmost strong edges correspond to foreground edges. It should be noted that, while usually, the foreground writing appears darker than the background image, as shown in sample image Figure 2(a), there are cases where the foreground and background have similar intensities as shown in Figure 2(b), or worst still, the background is more prominent than the foreground as in Figure 2(c). So using only the intensity value is not enough to differentiate the foreground from the background. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

Editors and Affiliations

  • Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    Sameer Singh

  • Computational Intelligence Group, Tuiuti University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil

    Nabeel Murshed

  • Institute of Computer Aided Automation PRIP-Group 1832, Vienna University of Technology, Wien, Austria

    Walter Kropatsch

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us