Authors:
- Explores the fundamental dichotomy between achieving social knowledge vs. wisdom, and the roles played by the physical and social sciences in explaining and promoting a balance
- Uses dramatic examples from recent history (e.g., the Bolshevik Revolution, China’s Cultural Revolution, and the rise of Nazism)
- For researchers and students in the social sciences (political science, sociology, history), ethics, economic and social theory
- Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras
Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (ITKM, volume 11)
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (14 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
About this book
At both a micro-information level and a macro-societal level, the concepts of “knowledge” and “wisdom” are complementary – in both decisions and in social structures and institutions. At the decision level, knowledge is concerned with how to make a proper choice of means, where “best” is measured as the efficiency toward achieving an end. Wisdom is concerned with how to make a proper choice of ends that attain “best” values.
At a societal level, knowledge is managed through science/technology and innovation. And while science/technology is society's way to create new means with high efficiencies, they reveal nothing about values. Technology can be used for good or for evil, to make the world into a garden or to destroy all life. It is societal wisdom which should influence the choice of proper ends -- ends to make the world a garden.
How can society make progress in wisdom as well as knowledge? Historically, the disciplines of the physical sciences and biology have provided scientific foundations for societal knowledge But the social science disciplines of sociology, economics, political science have not provided a similar scientific foundation for societal wisdom. To redress this gap, Frederick Betz examines several cases in recent history that display a fundamental paradox between scientific/technological achievement with devastating social effects (i.e., historical events of ideological dictatorships in Russia, Germany, China, and Yugoslavia). He builds a new framework for applying social science perspectives to explain societal histories and social theory. Emerging from this methodological and empirical investigation is a general topological theory of societal dynamics. This theory andmethodology can be used to integrate history and social science toward establishing grounded principles of societal wisdom.
Authors and Affiliations
-
, Department of Engineering and Technology, Portland State University, Portland, USA
Frederick Betz
About the author
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Societal Dynamics
Book Subtitle: Understanding Social Knowledge and Wisdom
Authors: Frederick Betz
Series Title: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1278-6
Publisher: Springer New York, NY
eBook Packages: Business and Economics, Business and Management (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-4614-1277-9Published: 24 November 2011
Softcover ISBN: 978-1-4899-8997-0Published: 25 January 2014
eBook ISBN: 978-1-4614-1278-6Published: 25 November 2011
Series ISSN: 2197-5698
Series E-ISSN: 2197-5701
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XXIV, 344
Topics: Social Sciences, general, Sociology, general, History of Economic Thought/Methodology