Skip to main content

Analysis of Dis/agreement - with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory

  • Book
  • © 2003

Overview

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library (LAPS, volume 66)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (13 chapters)

  1. Introduction

  2. Some fundamental types of proposition about what something is

  3. Topics from the assessment of tenability

  4. Some forms of language and argumentation that often make it unclear which type of proposition one is confronted with; in particular on the flight from the normative proposition

  5. Reconstruction and redefinition: a distinct and widespread combination of the fundamental proposition types

  6. Conclusion

Keywords

About this book

In order to determine whether two participants in a discussion are in real dis/agreement, one must compare their propositions. Comparison presupposes yardsticks in common. Analysis of Dis/agreement thematises such yardsticks, in that it demonstrates the existence, content and factual significance of a relatively well-delimited set of proposition types and proposition patterns, with their accompanying tenability criteria and motivating interests. The book is a work in the field of legal theory by virtue of its demonstrating how lawyers' power of judgement is constituted in and through these yardsticks. The book is interdisciplinary by virtue of its demonstrating how the same yardsticks come into play more generally in argumentation formulated in everyday language, i.e. independently of law. And the book is a work in the field of philosophy by virtue of its demonstrating the existence and factual significance of language and argumentation actions with a certain independence in relation to the level of controversial fundamental philosophical positions.

Authors and Affiliations

  • University of Oslo, Norway

    Svein Eng

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us